recent elections are rarely as heated as the '08 race for the Democratic nomination between freshman Illinois Senator Barack Obama and New York Senator Hillary Clinton. From TV bickering of their national debates in recent jabs over NAFTA, the battle is hung on the margins of a tiny few times during their campaigns. 4th March was an important day for primary candidates Hillary Clinton, because he managed, at least for the second time, defy the odds and win the key states Ohio and Texas, taking a less important Rhode Island to boot.
While Barack Obama still holds lead in delegates, Hillary found out about election results in Ohio during the evening press conference in time for the news, which has enabled her to capitalize on the phenomenon that was mainly directed at her opponent: momentum . In a speech more reminiscent of Obama's earlier inclusion of a "message of Change" from its own stump, Clinton played her cards better loser than ever before. As far as rhetoric goes, Obama has long held an advantage, relying on his emotional appeal to rally confidence. However, his tone was somewhat subdued and Science in his victory party in San Antonio, as he reiterated the fact about how the numbers are on his side, and that his delegate lead and will continue to be difficult for Clinton to win. the tables were turned, though short, despite Obama's important winning streak of 11 states in the order and national attention that was focused on his campaign, as a result.
Americans are increasingly focusing on issues where the candidates have different views, as much of their literature shows their platform will be about 90% the same, with healthcare and the economy emerging as the most important in recent days. Ohio voters blame the North American Free Trade Agreement as being responsible for outsourcing jobs to foreign countries, and his creations Bill Clinton in the early 90-has proved a complicated undertaking for Hillary for a spin. Stating that she always thought that NAFTA was fundamentally flawed, Clinton has recently gone on the offensive after one of Obama's staff reportedly told the Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs that the agreement would be renegotiated under his administration. Even if the remark was rude, or not meant to represent Obama's true position, as stated in the past few days, neither candidate will likely have a lot of leeway in relation to the contract because of how beneficial it is America's consistent oil supplies, which will be the biggest bargaining chip in Canada stacks.
Since Canada is obliged to provide oil to the U.S. whenever there is a perceived danger of the deficit, they will be able to use this leverage. Since both candidates largely paid lip service populist sentiment, the real question is: Who will be able to turn this into a nomination? Ohio and Texas are both complicated matters for Obama, who now has a tough campaign ahead, and the Democratic Party as a whole, which will certainly be weakened for a united Republican attack.